A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to be amongst ministers
and high-level government officials attending the 14th annual Delhi
Sustainable Development Summit. The conference showcased a host of highly
recognizable names, including Kofi Annan as the keynote speaker.
As one of only a few women in my office, I am always acutely
aware of the gender disparity around me. Upon first glance, I was excited to
see so many young women attending the conference.
However, once the conference began, those women disappeared.
I realized that those women were the organizers; the women behind the scenes. They introduced the sessions, welcomed the speakers
and moderated the discussions. They were in essence, transition women. Their
value was held in their ability to make sessions to run smoothly, rather than
to share their knowledge or experience. Their superficial presence was an
attempt to placate gender advocates with a thin façade of allowing women to be
present without actually participating.
A feeble attempt to include gender sensitivity in the
conference was to include a gender panel discussion. Seemingly an afterthought,
the session was in the afternoon of the last day with five of the six panelists
being men. It was clear from their presentations that there were just as surprised
to be presenting, as we were to hear them.
There is something incredibly frustrating about
International Women’s Day. Perhaps it’s the patronizing way that the day is honored.
It reminds me of the older man in my office, telling me that I’m beautiful. I feel
like I should be flattered, but its
delivery rubs me the wrong way.
I asked around the office about the significance of the International
Women’s Day. What is women’s day? What is
the purpose? My admiring colleague told me “It’s a day that men sleep under the bed”. While others told me
that “it’s just a reason to have a
party.” Their incredulous stares made it clear that the intention of the
day has nothing to do with promoting women’s equality.
Nonetheless, Addis Ababa was a flurry with events throughout
the city. My organization, not to be outdone by the potential PR buzz of
International Women’s Day, is hosting its own event.
My organization will invite dignitaries and their wives to
plant trees. Admittedly, I work for an environmental think tank and re-greening
initiatives are a part of our mandate. However, I must admit that I was
disappointed with the superficial and uninspired attempt at promoting gender
equality. Here we are, an environmental think tank, with a plethora of
evidence indicating how the adverse effects of climate change and environmental
degradation disproportionately affects women.
As if that weren’t compelling enough, we are surrounded by
examples of those effects on a daily basis. We live in a city where women walk
5-10 kilometers a day down the mountain with several kilos of firewood on their
back. We live in a city where pollution from burning plastic and exhaust hangs heavy
in the air. We live in a city with nearly no green spaces for its 4 million
occupants. We live in a city with
landfills that house hundreds of residents within its confines. The effects of poor environmental management have palpable
consequences on women and our response is to have a photo opportunity with an
ambassador’s wife planting trees.
It feels like the Delhi conference all over again. Women are
in the room but not in any empowered capacity. I’m disappointed that at 2014,
we are still having the same conversations about gender inequality, yet not at
all surprised since this is the superficial approach we take at addressing the
issue.
It is another missed opportunity.
Well put :)
ReplyDelete// Anna